Cleaners for real estate wasteland break fracture, developers improper compensation 120 thousand yua-www.haole10.com

The cleaning staff for the real estate developers fell wasteland improper command lost 120 thousand yuan Chongqing evening news cleaners for real estate cleaning accidentally broke into fractures, developers staff there improper command in a court, before the date of the case make two judgment: developers bear 70% of the liability, compensation for the loss of 12 yuan bin. In October 2013, a cleaning company in Chongqing signed a clean land contract with Chongqing real estate developers. According to the contract, the developer should provide special attention information to the cleaning company to avoid the occurrence of accidents. After signing the contract, the cleaning company Paihumou, Chen et al to the real estate business cleaning. In November of the same year, Procter & Gamble employees Hu by developers staff assigned, over the balcony on the cover of the garbage cleaning vents, due to rupture of injured falling from the vent cover. The accident caused Hu body 4 fractures, Hu will developers to court. The court of first instance, Hu developers staff assigned by the over balconies cleaning rubbish carelessly vent cover, so developers should bear the responsibility for compensation of injured Hu Hu, but as a full civil capacity, should also have enough attention to its own security obligations, so the damage consequences should also bear some responsibility. Accordingly, the court of first instance decided that the developer should bear 70% responsibility for Hu’s injury, totaling 12 yuan compensation. Developers refused to accept the appeal to the first intermediate court of the city. City Court held that the facts to prove that Hu Department staff assigned to clean air vents by developers and developers of garbage, and not on vent cover hidden safety problems prompted the Hu injured bear the main responsibility for compensation. Accordingly, the court of second instance before the date of final appeal upheld the judgment. The judge said, in this case, although the developers signed a contract with the company, but the developers due to improper command staff cleaning company employees Hu injured. Therefore, for Hu injured facts, developers exist fault. Hu’s injury is belong to inductrial injury, can enjoy treatment of inductrial injury insurance is another legal relationship, has been dealt with. Home decoration owners how to avoid cleaning wasteland when compensate developers due to improper command staff’s cleaning staff were injured, the developers when the paymaster in life, many readers or home decoration new premises are faced with slag, reclamation, cleaning and other issues, in the face of cleaning company or decoration company to arrange the cleaning staff, as the owner of the you command a will, how can we avoid like the developers as paymaster? What words should be said? What can’t be said? Chongqing evening news legal team, Chongqing Changlong Xu Xingquan law firm lawyers said that the owners need to do house cleaning, it is best to find the regular cleaning company signed a contract by Procter & Gamble personnel arrangements, the agreement will be out of the safety accidents by cleaning company to take responsibility in general contract. In order to avoid responsibility, the owner best only put forward general requirements, not too small to command the cleaning staff to work, if due to accidents caused by improper command, the owner must bear responsibility. Xu Xingquan lawyer reminded, as employment Dan Ming

保洁员为楼盘开荒摔骨折 开发商指挥不当赔12万元   重庆晚报讯 保洁员为楼盘开荒保洁时不慎摔成骨折,开发商工作人员存在指挥不当,市一中院日前对该案作出二审判决:开发商承担七成责任,赔偿保洁员各项损失12万余元。   2013年10月,重庆一家保洁公司与重庆房地产开发商签订《开荒清洁合同》。根据合同约定,开发商应向保洁公司提供特别注意事项信息,避免人员意外事故的发生。   合同签订后,保洁公司派胡某、陈某等人到楼盘进行开荒保洁业务。同年11月,保洁公司员工胡某受开发商员工指派,翻越室内阳台清扫通风口盖板上的垃圾,因盖板破裂从通风口处坠落受伤。   此次事故造成胡某身上4处骨折,胡某将开发商告上法庭。   一审法院认为,胡某在开发商员工指派下翻越室内阳台清扫通风口盖板垃圾时不慎摔伤,因此开发商应对胡某受伤承担赔偿责任,但胡某作为完全民事行为能力人,也应对自身安全有足够注意义务,故对其自身损害后果也应承担一定责任。   据此,一审法院判决开发商需对胡某受伤承担70%的责任,共计赔偿12万余元。开发商不服,向市一中院提起上诉。   市一中院审理后认为,查明事实足以证明胡某系受开发商员工指派去清扫通风口垃圾,而开发商又未对通风口盖板存在安全隐患进行提示,故应对胡某的受伤承担主要赔偿责任。据此,二审法院日前作出维持原判的终审判决。   承办法官称,本案中,虽然开发商是与保洁公司签订合同,但开发商工作人员因指挥不当导致保洁公司员工胡某受伤。因此,对于胡某受伤的事实,开发商存在过错。胡某的受伤是否属于工伤、能否享受工伤保险待遇则属另一法律关系,已另案处理。   居家保洁装修开荒   房主如何避免当赔匠   开发商员工因指挥不当造成保洁员受伤,结果开发商当了赔匠——生活中,不少读者居家或装修新房时都会面临出渣、开荒、保洁等问题,面对保洁公司或装修公司安排的保洁员,作为房主的你指挥一下再所难免,如何才能避免像开发商一样当赔匠?哪些话该说?哪些话不能说?   重庆晚报新闻律师团成员、重庆长隆律师事务所徐兴权律师称,房主需要给房屋做保洁时,最好找正规保洁公司签订合同,由保洁公司安排人员进行,一般情况下合同中都会约定出了安全事故由保洁公司承担责任。为避免担责,房主最好只提出大致要求,不要过细地指挥保洁人员如何工作,如果因指挥不当造成意外,房主就要承担责任。   徐兴权律师提醒,作为用工单位的保洁公司一定要为员工购买工伤保险,否则一旦出现工伤事故,后果不堪设想。   如果房主不是找保洁公司,而是直接找个体保洁人员呢?   徐兴权律师建议,这种情况最好是让保洁人员独立完成相关保洁服务——这是一种直接承揽关系,指承揽人按照定作人(即房主)的要求完成工作,交付工作成果,定作人给付报酬的法律关系。承揽关系中,承揽人虽也是定作人选任并为之服务,但承揽人是独立完成工作,不在定作人直接监督之下。房主并未发出具体工作指令,而是将清扫房屋及擦拭玻璃等事项包给保洁人员。完成工作任务后,双方不存在控制、支配等关系,承揽人独立完成工作成果,无须接受房主的监督、指导和指挥,对其所承揽的工作安排有完全自主权。   侵权责任法规定,个人之间形成劳务关系,提供劳务一方因劳务自己受到损害的,根据双方各自过错承担相应责任。徐兴权律师提醒,作为房主应当对保洁人员负有安全保障义务或必要的劳动工具。如果尽到了安全保障义务及提供的劳动工具没有问题,是保洁人员自身原因如自己不小心以及和工作无关的事情——比如打电话,和别人聊天发生意外的,则根据责任大小来分摊责任。   徐兴权律师表示,从现行钟点工受伤案例来看,如果房主确实没有任何责任,法官一般会进行调解,由房主给予一定补偿,也就是从人道主义进行补偿。 重庆晚报记者 唐中明相关的主题文章: